The Anthropology of Islam
G. Marranci  (Oxford: Berg, 2008)

All quoted materials remain copyright of original author/publisher. Page numbers cited herein are for Marranci 2008 unless otherwise stated.

 

 


Introduction

"...need to observe the methodology employed instead of the classic academic divisions." (pg 5)

"...the anthropology of islam (AOI), today, cannot be other than global..." (p.5)
           e.g. Muslims -- transnational networks

Essentialism
(Fallacy of the 'Muslim mind theory)

"...argues that religion induces Muslims to believe, behave, act. think, argue and develop their identity as Muslims despite their disparate heritages, ethnicities, nationalities, experiences, gender, sexual orientations and, last but not least, mind." (p.6)

See: Geaves, R. (2005) The Dangers of Essentialism: South Asian Communities in Britain and the "World Religions" Approach to the Study of Religions, Contemporary South Asia 14(1) p.75-90

"... emotions and feelings should be at the centre of our studies of Islam ...[fieldwork] ... should incorporate an analysis of the emotional context within which we operate ... [t]his means refocusing our attention to how human beings make sense of the 'map'  that we call Islam  ... to observe interpretations of Islam as part of networks of shared meanings ... to observe concepts ... as the result of interpretations affected by personal identity, emotions, feelings, and the environment..." (p.6)

"We should start from Muslims, rather than Islam ... the main thing Muslims share among themselves ... is the fact they are human beings." (p.7)

AOI -- Islam: "...a map of discourses on how to 'feel Muslim'. (p.8)

"We need to reconsider the relationship between scientific disciplines and anthropology ... viewing culture as a special feature, essential to the definition of the human being, may invite us to consider ...whether culture is irredeemably essentialist in itself." (p.9)

See: Wikan, U. (1999) Culture: A New Concept of Race, Social Anthropology 7(1) p.57-64
 

From Studying Islam to Studying Muslims

The Beginnings of Anthropology

Bronislaw Malinowski (1884 -1942) ...participant observation aka fieldwork
Franz Boas (1858-1942) ...cultural anthropology (USA)
Alfred Radcliffe-Brown (1881-1955) ...social anthropologist (UK), structural functionalism.

Edward SaidStudying Islam: Orientalism
Edward Said (1978) Orientalism (London Penguin)
German Orientalists, e.g. Goldziher"...studied Islam in the same way as classic Greek or Latin cultures." (p.33)
"Orientalists saw real Muslims, in flesh and bone, as irrelevant." (p.33)
Books 'n' Bats: Orientalism

Middle East Studies
"...focused on political, economic and strategic analysis ... anthropologists, avoiding the political debate, ghettoized themselves in the villages..." (p.34)

Ernest GellnerGeertz & Gellner
Clifford Geertz's Islam Observed (1968); Ernest Gellner's Muslim Society (1981) - both important precursors to a satisfactory anthropology of Islam, but ultimately flawed. See: D. Varisco (2004) Islam Obscured: The Rhetoric of Anthropological Representation (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan)

Gilsenan
Michael Gilsenan, Recognizing Islam (1982) "...seminal book succeeded in avoiding essentialism..." (p.38)
Constitute a "valid start" in the foundation of the anthropology of Islam.
Two key methodological elements in a sociological analysis of Islam:Michael Gilsenan

First, to examine the practices and everyday lives of persons describing themselves as Muslims and the discourses of authority that are taken for granted or struggled over; second, to use such an attempt at understanding to reflect back critically on the ways in which Westerners in general tended to approach societies in which such practices, teaching, forms of knowledge and culture are significant." (Gilsenan, 1982, p.5)

Gilsenan"...reversed Gellner's Eurocentric view of Muslim societies, and provided a paradigm for understanding Islam as a discourse within society rather than an essence shaping it." (p.39)

el-Zein
Abdul Hamid el-Zein (1977) 'Beyond Ideology and Theology: the Search for the Anthropology of Islam', Annual Review of Anthropology, 6, p.227-54 "...in the midst of this diversity of meaning, is there a single, real Islam?" (el-Zein, 1977, p.249)Talal Asad Answer - from an anthropological perspective, no. The idea of "islams".

Asad
Talal Asad rejects el-Zein's "brave effort", in The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam (1986), arguing that "...in an anthropological analysis of Islam, Muslims' theological views could not be ignored." (p.41) Islam = discursive tradition beginning with Qur'an/Hadith, whereby anthropology seeks to make sense of historical conditions in which tradition(s) is(are) produced/maintained. Problems of individual Muslims knowledge of tradition, disputes within the tradition, etc -- Asad's stance = "proto-theological paradigm" (p.42)

Lila Abu LughodAbu-Lughod
Lila Abu Lughod (1989) 'Zones of Theory in the Anthropology of the Arab World', Annual Review of Anthropology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 8 p.267-306. ME anthropology reviewed, highlighting deficiencies rather than offering a paradigm, identifying three zones of theorizing: segmentation, the harem and Islam, thus excluding studies focusing on other areas, e.g. emotions, migration, etc.. Also argued that ME anthropology mired in an ahistoricism producing "...its own brand of essentialism -- the essentialism of Arab culture." (Abu Lughod, 1989, p.301).

Lukens-Bull
Ronald A. Lukens-Bull (1999) 'Between Texts and Practice: Considerations in the Anthropology of Islam' Marburg Journal of Religion 4(2) p.1-10. Asks the question of what is being studied, differentiates between theological and anthropological, posits "central task" of anthropology of Islam = a comparative study of how Ronald Lukens-Bull to be a Muslim (which he defines as submission to God), a definition that "...cleverly reconciles both the emic and etic viewpoints" (p.44), but Marranci argues there is no need to define Islam in order to study Muslims anthropologically.

Varisco
Daniel Varisco (2005) Islam Obscured. A rather incomplete and not very anthropologically informed review can be found here.

Important issues:

  • impact of colonialism

  • need to extend zones of theorizing

  • global study, including West, defined by methodology
    (Western studies of Islam utilising fieldwork often defined as sociology)

  • important to ensure participants voice audible within ethnological research

  • anthropology of Islam more easily defined in the negative (i.e. it's not theology!)

Anthropologist better to observe "...the dynamics of Muslim lives expressed through their ideological and rhetorical understanding of their surrounding (social, natural, virtual) environment" (p.50)
 

Studying Muslims in the West

"...western based ethnographies of Muslim lives ended in a cultural hermeneutic suggesting Islam as the ultimate shaper of migrants' lives" (p.53)

Western studies 'zones of theorizing' that are most prominent:

  • integration, education, gender (the three most prominent), second generations, Islamism

1970s - ethnic/national original attracted attention of social scientists, changed in 1980s...
Shift from migrant to settlement populations
Myth of return (Anwar, 1979)

Islam perceived as principle barrier to integration at the end of 1980s. See especially:

  • Honeyford affair

  • Rushdie affair

  • Affaire du Foulard

  • Danish Cartoon affair (post 9/11)

"...in all three 'affairs' and in an exponential way, the western mass media played a central role in shaping the debate on Muslims in the west" (p.57)

Research focusing on new generations has tended to concludes that second generation migrants were "living between two cultures" (I believed this, until I starting asking Muslims about it). See e.g. Jacobson, 1998, and the influential use of identity theory

"My experience of conducting fieldwork among western Muslims in several European countries has made me suspicious of monolithic models of identity as well as certain cultural feminist analyses, which, in an attempt to denounce the patriarchal oppression of women, ended in representing women as disempowered passive objects without real will. The authors have interpreted Islam as a cultural force capable of overwhelming nature, environment and time." (p.60)

Challenges idea that "cultural features are unequivocally related to identity." (p61) My (Yakoub's) own view is that ideas of culture and identity should be used to illuminate individual Muslim stories and comment on how they may be indicative of wider trends, rather than suggesting such an unequivocal relationship!

Post 9/11
Problem of anthropologists tending to relatively marginal compared to other disciplines vis-ŕ-vis the media.
See e.g. Tabsir blog.
Importance of included variety of perspectives, including the Muslim voice - see e.g. Abbas (2005)
Pressure to "..advance a counter-hegemonic discourse against simplifications that affected not only the political but also the academic discourse" (p.66)

Calls for direct involvement of anthropologists in human rights:
Sluka, J., Chomsky, N., and Price, D., (2002) "'Terrorism' and the Responsibility of the Anthropologist", Anthropology Today 18(2) 22-3

Problem of cultural talk (Mamdani, 2002) where culture is offered as an explanation, minus e.g. history. Need to place cultural debates in historical/political context
Mamdani, M. (2002) Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: A Political Perspective on Culture and Terrorism, American Anthropologist 104(3) p.766-75
"The relationship between history, politics and culture is a complex one." (p.67)

Sundar (2004) "...culturalist explanation of mass violence had for long time set up an unacceptable hierarchy of cultures, the heritage of a colonial past..." (p.67) - in my view, not only when talking about violence!

Fieldwork Among Muslims

Fieldwork "central feature of anthropology" (p.71)

Bad example of Muslim anthropology - Rabinow (1977).
"Rabinow was surely an observer, yet too defensive to become a participant (beyond the sexual indulgences of youth)" (p.73)

Traditional approaches to fieldwork challenged at end of 1980s, impacting on anthropology of Islam, "...where the voices of the researched started to be represented and the complex human relationships between the fieldworker and his or her 'people' were not only acknowledged but also made an integral part of their ethnographies." (p.75)

Emotion
Rosaldo (1993)
Argued ethnographer's experience determines level of empathy
Against this - emotion as ecological rather than social
Milton, K. & Svasek, M. [Eds.] (2005) Mixed Emotions: Anthropological Studies of Feeling (Oxford: Berg)
Muslim = human being who feels Muslim

"Participant observation means taking part in the emotional processes involving the formation of feelings" (p.85)

  • good knowledge of Islam and its texts

  • acquainted with prevailing rhetorics in the contemporary Muslim world

Other Issues
Contemporary researchers need to be aware of:

  • Dynamic of Muslim and non-Muslim interactions (they are frequent but often overlooked)

  • Impact of mass media

  • Impact of crap and biased research

  • Political tensions

Necessitates a "clear and ethical approach" and the "development of empathy and emotional participation in the life of the studied Muslim community" (p.86)
António Damásio

Understanding Muslim Identities  

Concepts of self/identity draw on work of Kay Milton and Antonio Rosa Damasio

 

Kay Milton

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

books 'n' bats