|
tasneem wikis
-SelfWiki
-ShaykhWiki
-BooksnbatsWiki
-MuzzieWiki
-TerrorWiki
-T99Wiki
-ScribbleWiki
external links
. Alan Godlas
. Alibris UK
. Bawa Muhaiyaddeen
. CAMPACC
. Focus on Religion
. Guantánamo Bay
. Hazrat Inayat Khan
. Help the Prisoners
. IFEES
. Imaan
. Institute for Race Relations
. ISIM Review
. Islamophobia Watch
. John Pilger
. Kitaabun
. Liberal Muslim Links
. Liberty
. Message of the Quran
. MPACUK
. Muslim Peace Fellowship
. Muslimistan
. Naomi Klein
. Octagon Press
. Peace Pledge Union
. Protect the Human
. Restless Beings
. Rumi
. Sala@m
. Saqi Books
. Unite Against Fascism
. Women Living Under Muslim Laws
the listing of external sites herein does not automatically constitute an endorsement of their contents
make up your own mind!
|
"Personality is art itself and the greatest
art."
Hazrat Inayat Khan |
All mind maps are produced using
Inspiration ® 7.5 software
This website is best viewed with Microsoft 7+
|
|
Phenomenology, Embodiment and Beyond |
|
"Perception is not something that happens to us, or in us. It
is something we do."
Alva Noe (Action
in Perception, 2004) |
|
Phenomenological moves... A movement in philosophy which has influenced a wide range of academic
disciplines, phenomenology has its origins in the works of
Edmund Husserl
(1859-1958), with Martin Heidegger
(1889-1976)
and Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) being among the
earliest prominent thinkers influenced by Husserl and the phenomenological approach.
Among the
disciplines incorporating phenomenological ideas are the cognitive sciences,
notably in relation to the writings of Maurice
Merleau-Ponty (1908-1961), who was concerned with the relationships
between the body, consciousness, and the outside world. Merleau-Ponty's works
were particularly important in the development of the concept of embodiment in
sociology and social theory, whilst his ideas on perception have been taken up
by Harvard philosopher Alva Noe.
Phenomenology has contributed to the methodological debates in disciplines as
diverse as
anthropology, theology and hermeneutics. Husserl's ideas were also developed
by sociologists, notably Alfred Schutz
(1899-1959), and later
by Peter Berger (1929-) and Thomas
Luckmann (1927-). Other thinkers who have drawn on the insights on
phenomenology include Derrida (1930-2004),
Emmanuel Levinas (1906-1995) and
Hannah Arendt (1906-1975). |
|
|
Phenomenological
intentions...
"Basically, phenomenology studies the structure of various types
of experience ranging from perception, thought, memory, imagination, emotion,
desire, and volition to bodily awareness, embodied action, and social activity,
including linguistic activity. The structure of these forms of experience
typically involves what Husserl called “intentionality”, that is, the
directedness of experience toward things in the world, the property of
consciousness that it is a consciousness of or about something. According to
classical Husserlian phenomenology, our experience is directed toward —
represents or “intends” — things only through particular concepts, thoughts,
ideas, images, etc. These make up the meaning or content of a given experience,
and are distinct from the things they present or mean."
"Phenomenology came into its own with Husserl, much as
epistemology came into its own with Descartes, and ontology or metaphysics came
into its own with Aristotle on the heels of Plato. Yet phenomenology has been
practiced, with or without the name, for many centuries. When Hindu and Buddhist
philosophers reflected on states of consciousness achieved in a variety of
meditative states, they were practicing phenomenology..."
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy... |
|
"...we enact our perceptual experience; we act it out." (p.1) All
perception is active. Touch rather than vision is the better paradigm for
perception. The enactive approach.
Implications of:
* "...perceiving is a kind of skilful bodily activity." (p.2) i.e.
certain bodily skills are required to be a perceiver;
* Rejects notion of perception as being in the brain and involves
internal representation of the world;
* Such a phenomenological approach is counterintuitive.
Rejects
input-output model of perception (Hurley, 1998) and rejects the notion that
capacities of perception, action and thought can be disassociated from each
other.
Ganzfeld -- seeing through halved ping-pong balls!
Experiential blindness -- restored sight to the congenitally blind, which is
initially confused and meaningless.
"To see, one must have visual impressions that one
understands." (p.6) |
Alva Noe
Action in Perception
(The MIT Press, 2004)
Chapter 1:
|
|
Phenomenological futures... "The shape
that phenomenological philosophy will take in the first decades of its second
century is difficult to say. Work in the four established tendencies will
certainly continue. But perhaps the emphasis will be on philosophical
anthropology and related issues such as ecology, gender, ethnicity, religion,
and technology as well as continuing concerns with aesthetics, ethics,
philosophy of the human and natural kinds of science, and politics."
Centre for
Advanced Research in Phenomenology |
|
Although Common thought would have us believe that we have only five senses, in
fact we have a sixth sense known as proprioception.
Proprioception is a holistic and usually unconscious sense that gives us
information regarding the location, movement and posture of our bodies in
physical space. This information gained by sensory receptors found all over our
bodies helps us to keep and maintain what is known as our body schema -- the
unconscious map of our bodies, almost like a plan inside our heads that tells us
where our different body parts are. There are rare instances of people losing
their sense of proprioception. One of the most famous is the case of
Ian Waterman, who lost this sense as a result of a viral infection.
Remarkably, Ian relearned to walk and even drive, but every action he
undertakes is the result of unfaltering planning and concentration.
Alva Noe
points to Ian's experiences as evidence for his phenomenological theory of
perception. |
|
|
Phenomenological plop plops... Mircea Eliade
"...makes a distinction between his phenomenological and non-reductionist
approach, and other disciplinary approaches ... which he considers 'false' since
they analyse religion exclusively as human rather than sacred activity ... For
both [Donald] Wiebe and [Russell] McCutcheon, the existence of a distinct
religious category of the sacred is a theological assumption, based on a
particular form of faith, which can be neither proved or disproved. Instead,
they argue that the study of religion is doing what Eliade refutes: studying
religion as a human activity."
Malory Nye (Religion: The Basics,
2008, p.114) |
|